The Obsolescence Brief Sign in Subscribe
← All briefs Parts Teardown

TLP250 replacement: the HCPL-3120, TLP352 and gate-driver optocoupler options compared

The Toshiba TLP250 gate-driver optocoupler is obsolete, and every still-made cross drives more current and adds UVLO.

TLP250: Obsolete HCPL-3120: closest pin match TLP352: active same-vendor TLP350: usual cross, also EOL

The Toshiba TLP250 isolated gate-driver optocoupler is obsolete, and every still-made cross a search returns drives more current and adds undervoltage lockout. Same 8-pin DIP, different gate drive: the cross-vendor HCPL-3120 is the closest pin match, Toshiba's own TLP352 changes pin 7, and the popular TLP350 cross is itself obsolete. The sections below work through those differences, part by part.

01

Status // The part in question

Lifecycle status

The TLP250 is obsolete. The TLP250 and TLP250F read Obsolete at DigiKey and Mouser and are no longer manufactured. No primary Toshiba discontinuation notice number was located; the distributor lifecycle flag is the source. Confirm the exact orderable you use, the TLP250H is a separate, later device (2015 datasheet) listed active, a different part, not the same silicon.

Buying remaining stock only defers requalification, it does not remove it. Plan a last-time-buy alongside the design-in of one named cross, and budget the requalification either way.

Current stock and any last-time-buy window are dated data for the email, not this page.

02

Candidates // Why these

The candidate set

The parts engineers actually cross-shop for the TLP250, each with its own fit-catch to validate in your design:

TLP352Toshiba · active same-vendor pathACTIVE
Peak ±2.5A · UVLO yes
Pin 7 N.C. (was 2nd output)
Iso 3750 Vrms · 8-DIP

Catch: pin 7 and the electrical shift. 2.5A peak, UVLO, and a fast 200ns delay. Pin 7 is a no-connect where the TLP250 has a second output, check any trace tied to pin 7. Re-check the gate resistor, timing, and that the rail clears the UVLO threshold (~12.5V typ).

HCPL-3120Broadcom · closest pin matchACTIVE
Peak 2.0-2.5A · UVLO yes
Pin 7 Vo (2nd output, kept)
Iso 3750 Vrms · 8-DIP

Catch: electrical, not pinout. The closest match to the TLP250: same second output on pin 7, pin 5 the output return either way. Active and widely stocked. What differs is 2.0-2.5A peak and UVLO (~12.3V typ), re-tune the gate drive and confirm the VEE return.

TLP350Toshiba · the usual first crossOBSOLETE
Peak ±2.5A · UVLO yes
Pin 7 N.C. (was 2nd output)
Iso 3750 Vrms · 8-DIP

Catch: it is also obsolete. The classic 2.5A cross a tool returns for the TLP250, but it reads Obsolete at DigiKey and Mouser, crossing to it moves one end-of-life part to another. Toshiba's current part is the TLP352.

TLP351Toshiba · lower-current member0.6A
Peak ±0.6A · UVLO none
Pin 7 N.C. (was 2nd output)
Iso 3750 Vrms · 8-DIP

Catch: it drives less current. Active, but 0.6A peak (below the TLP250's 1.5A) with no UVLO. Built for smaller IGBT gates, it fits a smaller gate, not a like-for-like replacement for a 1.5A design.

UCC23513 / Si823xTI / Skyworks · leave the opto behindREDESIGN
Type non-optical isolated
Gain no LED wear path
Fit different footprint

Catch: technology and footprint change. These fill the isolated-gate-drive role without an LED. TI markets the UCC23513 (SO-6) as a pin-to-pin upgrade for 6-pin opto drivers, but against a TLP250 8-pin DIP it is a different footprint; the Si823x is SOIC and not pin-compatible. Consider them when the board is opening for a redesign anyway.

03

Pinout // Pin 7 is the tell

Same package, not the same gate drive

Three isolated gate-driver optocouplers share the exact 8-pin DIP outline, so a cross-reference on "8-pin gate-driver optocoupler" reads them as interchangeable. The non-obvious result: the cross-vendor HCPL-3120 lands pin-for-pin on the TLP250, while Toshiba's own TLP352 changes pin 7 from a second output to a no-connect, the same-vendor part needs a trace check the cross-vendor part does not.

8-pin gate-driver optocoupler DIP · pins 1 to 4, 6, 8 shared · pin 5 and pin 7 differ

TLP250Toshiba · reference
OBSOLETE
1N.C.
2Anode
3Cathode
4N.C.
Vcc8
Vo7
Vo6
GND5
HCPL-3120Broadcom
ACTIVE
1N.C.
2Anode
3Cathode
4N.C.
Vcc8
Vo7
Vo6
Vee5
TLP352Toshiba
ACTIVE
1N.C.
2Anode
3Cathode
4N.C.
Vcc8
N.C.7
Vo6
GND5

Pin color,green same function · amber label differs (Vee and GND both the output return) · red output pin becomes a no-connect

HCPL-3120 IS THE PIN MATCHIt sits on every TLP250 pin; only pin 5 changes label from GND to Vee, the same output-return node.
TLP352 MOVES PIN 7Pin 7 goes from a second Vo output to a no-connect, so the same-vendor part needs a trace check the cross-vendor part does not.
ELECTRICAL, NOT PINOUTEvery live cross raises peak drive (1.5A to 2.5A), adds UVLO, and raises isolation (2500 to 3750 Vrms). A pin match does not carry the gate drive across.

Pinout is necessary, not sufficient. Suggested candidates to validate in your own design, not drop-in equivalents. Form, fit and function is a property of your system.

04

Parametrics // Side by side

Comparison table

TLP250TLP350TLP351TLP352HCPL-3120
LifecycleObsoleteObsoleteActiveActiveActive
Peak I±1.5A±2.5A±0.6A±2.5A2.0-2.5A
Supply V10-3515-3010-3015-3015-30
UVLONoneYesNoneYesYes
Isolation2500 Vrms3750375037503750
Prop delay0.5µs500ns700ns200ns500ns
Pin 7Vo (2nd out)NCNCNCVo (2nd out)
Package8-DIP8-DIP8-DIP8-DIP8-DIP

The live crosses sit at higher drive current and 3750Vrms with UVLO, where the TLP250 is 1.5A and 2500Vrms with no UVLO. On pin 7 the TLP250 carries a second output; the Toshiba successors move it to a no-connect, while the Broadcom HCPL-3120 keeps it. Lifecycle flags are distributor/vendor-reported, not independently audited.

05

The gap // What a parametric search hides

What the cross-reference misses

A parametric search for "2.5A IGBT gate-drive optocoupler, 8-DIP, 3750Vrms" returns the TLP350, TLP352 and HCPL-3120 as matches for the TLP250. What it does not surface: that the TLP250 is a 1.5A, 2500Vrms, no-UVLO part while those crosses are higher-current, 3750Vrms, UVLO parts; that the closest-looking cross, the TLP350, is itself obsolete; and that the TLP351 in the same result list drives less current, not more.

The footprint match hides the drive-current step, the added UVLO, the pin 7 change, and the second part's own lifecycle, so the obvious cross can change gate drive strength and startup behavior, or design in a second end-of-life.

06

Decision // Fit to your design

How to choose

No single winner; a fit to your design and program. Both registers:

Closest still-made optoTLP352 / HCPL-3120, the active 2.5A-class parts. The HCPL-3120 is the closer pin match; the TLP352 keeps you same-vendor. Either way account for the step from 1.5A, the added UVLO, and 3750Vrms isolation.
Smaller gateTLP351, fits lower-power IGBTs at 0.6A, but confirm your gate charge and peak-current need sit below the TLP250's 1.5A before stepping down.
Low rail / no-UVLOConfirm the rail clears the candidate's UVLO threshold (~12.3 to 12.5V typ) before committing, or the output will not turn on at startup.
Board opening anywayEvaluate a modern non-optical isolated gate driver (UCC23513, Si823x) to drop the LED wear-out path, accepting a footprint change.
ProcurementThe same-vendor path (TLP352) is usually lowest requal friction; any cross-vendor part is a full requalification. Confirm each candidate's own lifecycle status, the common TLP350 cross is already obsolete.
07

Checklist // Before you commit

Before you buy

  1. Match the peak output current to your gate charge and switching-speed target, not just the package. The TLP250 is 1.5A; the TLP352 and HCPL-3120 are 2.5A-class; the TLP351 is 0.6A.

  2. Check for UVLO and confirm your gate-drive supply clears its threshold. The TLP250 has none; the TLP352, TLP350 and HCPL-3120 do.

  3. Confirm the pinout against your board, pin 7 especially. It is a second output on the TLP250 and HCPL-3120, a no-connect on the TLP350, TLP351 and TLP352.

  4. Confirm the candidate's own lifecycle status (active, not obsolete) before standardizing, the TLP350 fails this.

  5. Re-verify creepage and clearance if the isolation rating changes (2500 to 3750 Vrms) and the package body or pin spacing differs.

  6. Requalify in your system. A matching footprint does not qualify the part.

08

FAQ // Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions

What is the replacement for the TLP250?

There is no single drop-in. The active same-vendor path is the TLP352 (the TLP350 is also obsolete); the common cross-vendor part is the Broadcom HCPL-3120, the closest pin match. Both are 2.5A-class parts with UVLO, so they change the gate drive versus the 1.5A TLP250 and need validation, not a straight swap.

Is the TLP350 a drop-in for the TLP250?

It is the usual cross, at 2.5A, but it is itself obsolete at distribution, so it trades one end-of-life part for another. Look at the TLP352 instead of crossing the TLP250 to it.

Difference between the TLP250 and TLP350?

Peak output current (1.5A vs 2.5A), UVLO (the TLP250 has none, the TLP350 does), isolation (2500Vrms vs 3750Vrms), and pin 7 (a second output on the TLP250, a no-connect on the TLP350). They are not electrically identical.

Can the HCPL-3120 replace the TLP250?

It is a candidate to validate: active, 2.0 to 2.5A peak, UVLO, 3750Vrms, and pin-for-pin with the TLP250 on assignment (pin 5 is the output return either way). Re-tune the gate drive for the higher current and confirm the VEE return; it is not a guaranteed drop-in.

Is the TLP351 the same as the TLP352?

No. They share a pinout, but the TLP351 is a 0.6A part with no UVLO, and the TLP352 is a 2.5A part with UVLO and a faster 200ns delay. The TLP352 is the closer match to a 1.5A TLP250 design.

09

Signals // Watch List

The Watch List

Two things to carry forward:

01

The obvious cross is also end-of-life

The TLP350, the part most often returned as the TLP250 upgrade, is itself obsolete at distribution (DigiKey, Mouser); Toshiba's current part is the TLP352. Confirm a candidate's own lifecycle status before crossing to it.

02

Gate-driver optocouplers carry an LED wear-out path

The isolation LED ages over the part's life, one reason non-optical isolated gate drivers exist. TI's UCC23513 cites a >50-year isolation-barrier life. A like-for-like opto keeps the LED wear mechanism; a technology change removes it, at the cost of a footprint change.

10

Sources // Public, primary

Sources

  • Toshiba TLP352 datasheet (PDF) · active same-vendor gate driver
  • Toshiba TLP351 & TLP350 datasheets (PDF) · TLP350 obsolete at distribution
  • Toshiba TLP250 datasheet (PDF) · distributor lifecycle flag: Obsolete
  • Broadcom HCPL-3120 datasheet (PDF) · 2.0-2.5A gate driver
  • TI UCC23513 · product page · non-optical isolated gate driver
  • DigiKey / Mouser TLP250 & TLP350 lifecycle and stock pages

Editorially independent and from public sources only; lifecycle, pin and rating data is vendor-reported, not independently audited. Alternates are candidates to validate in your own design. Confirm every detail with the manufacturer before committing.

Hermann Njike

Hermann Njike is a systems obsolescence manager who leads the cross-functional response when critical components go end-of-life, and is the single point of contact for thousands of production parts.

Related briefs
The Brief, weekly

One obsolete part, worked out in full.