About
Straight answers, from no one who's selling
Every year, thousands of electronic components go end-of-life. The notices are scattered, the cross-references are shallow, and almost everything written about the problem is published by someone trying to sell you a tool, a brokerage service, or a data subscription.
The Obsolescence Brief is the missing piece: an independent publication for the engineers, procurement teams, and program managers who carry hardware BOM risk and need straight answers. When a part you depend on disappears, the question is never abstract.
It's this part, this board, this program. That's the level this site works at, and the only level that actually helps you make a decision.
Written by someone who does the work
This site is where I write down what that work actually looks like: how to read a lifecycle flag, when a "replacement" is really a replacement, and how to make a last-time-buy decision you won't regret in year twelve.
Built from public sources, held to one standard
Every article is built from public sources. Lifecycle flags, pin functions, and electrical ratings are vendor-reported and not independently audited, and I say so in every piece. Alternates named here are candidates to validate in your own system, never drop-in equivalents.
Independent analysis, open to support
When I compare obsolescence data platforms or name replacement candidates, no one pays for the verdict.
The analysis is built from public sources and never resells vendor data. Sponsorship and reader support are welcome and help keep the Brief going, but they never buy a placement, a named candidate, or the outcome of a comparison.
Get every new article by email
If your job includes keeping hardware alive after the parts stop shipping, this is written for you.
Free subscribers get every new article by email: replacement analyses, tool comparisons, and guides on managing component end-of-life.
Questions, corrections, or a part you'd like covered: hnike1020@gmail.com.